I decided that I would work on two concepts for the final Show Me designs – a minimalist approach, and a Pop Art style.
Minimalist
I started with the Minimalist version and initially sketched out an alphabet to explore the minimum strokes that are needed to allow a letter to be legible. Fortunately, the word ‘type’ has capital letter forms that seem to lend themselves to this style – I’m not sure some of the rest work as well!
Minimal alphabet sketch
I then did a number of sketches of both the word ‘type’ and the possible layout.
-
-
Minimal layout sketches 1
-
-
Minimal layout sketches 2
I wanted to keep the cover sparse with a minimum of information. It features the title, symbols for the 3 sections and a bar code. I decided I would limit my palette to black, white and red, and I would use sanserif typefaces. I did a search for some minimal typefaces and looked at my existing collection. I then chose to use three typefaces – Infinity, Source Sans Pro, and Futura PT.
After looking at my sketches, and asking for some feedback from my family, I decided I preferred the version with the word ‘type’ descending across the page. Using InDesign I created the cover and began laying out the pages. This proved quite challenging in terms of how to provide the information and keep a simple layout with lots of white space. As a result I have gone with two double pages to keep the design consistent. I also elected to use a square format because it worked well with the cover typeface. I created three versions:
Version 1: I used a basic grid to set out the information, and added red to draw out particular elements and create breaks in the layout. Having initially tried the last page arranged vertically, I couldn’t get it to looked balanced so I moved to horizontal rows instead. I used Infinity for the large question mark because it echoed the cover typeface. I also created the visuals for the last page. I found several possible cats but decided on an outline version as it worked better with the rest of the format. I then adapted it in Illustrator to create more of a question mark tail.
-
-
Cover
-
-
Page 1
-
-
Page 2
-
-
Page 3
-
-
Page 4
(Click on cover image for slideshow)
Version 2: based on the first version but I changed the question mark typeface and went bolder with the red. I added tints behind the main body text, as well as more space between the headings and paragraph text on the final page.
-
-
Version 2 cover
-
-
V2 page 1
-
-
V2 page 2
-
-
V2 page 3
-
-
V2 page 4
Version 3: I reduced some of the red on the second page and changed the format on page four reducing the size of the question mark and putting the header across the top.
-
-
Version 3 cover
-
-
V3 page 1
-
-
V3 page 2
-
-
V3 page 3
-
-
V3 page 4
Pop Art
I used the same development process as for the minimalist version; some sketching and background research. I was particularly struck by Peter Blake’s ‘Dazzle Alphabet’ and looked at how I might create something with that influence.
Peter Blake images and Dazzle Alphabet © Peter Blake
Using Adobe Draw I sketched out an idea for the cover, I used this method because it is fast and I find this works well when I’m thinking things through. It is also really easy to use fill colour so I can see the composition develop quickly. I had originally thought I would use this as a base drawing, which I would then tidy up in Illustrator/InDesign.
However, I remembered some earlier feedback from my tutor about the final design losing some of the urgency and freedom of my original sketches. I decided to be brave and use this original digital drawing as the cover, this felt risky because its messy but it seemed to work with the Pop Art theme and I wanted to challenge myself to develop it. This proved quite difficult particularly having started with the minimal design, as soon as I used a grid structure in InDesign the layout started to tighten up again and there was a mismatch between the inside pages and the cover.
At this point I was close to dropping the idea and trying something else, but after researching some typefaces I thought I should carry on and keep developing it. I liked the contradictions of something being handwritten but now infinitely repeatable being used; it felt in keeping with the critiques underlying much of Pop Art about consumerism and mass production. I went on to develop three versions:
Version 1: uses bold block colours and lines drawn with the mouse so they are evidently hand drawn. I decided on typefaces that echoed comics/80s advertising type text – Brush Hand New, From Where You Are and Lato. I also introduced repeating motifs, which was also a feature of Pop Art. I wasn’t sure this version pushed the concept far enough so decided to make changes.
-
-
Show Me 2 cover
-
-
Show Me 2 page 1
-
-
Show Me 2 page 2
-
-
Show Me 2 page 3
-
-
Show Me 2 page 4
Version 2: I changed the block colours on the inside pages and added a ‘whaam’ type motif with the 2000yrs. I also added black strokes to some of the typography to add to the popular culture type feel. This looked better but I thought the colours were still not quite right.
-
-
Show Me 2 v2 cover
-
-
Show Me 2 v2 page 1
-
-
Show Me 2 v2 page 2
-
-
Show Me 2 v2 page 3
-
-
Show Me 2 v2 page 4
Version 3: For this version I went red on pages two and three, which I think works better with the splash motif. I also made the archetypal structures in the background a little more prominent.
-
-
Show Me 2 version 3 cover
-
-
Show Me 2 version 3 page 1
-
-
Show Me 2 version 3 page 2
-
-
Show Me 2 version 3 page 3
-
-
Show Me 2 version 3 page 4
I think overall the minimalist version is probably the most successful and I have a preference for its clean structure. I made a minor change to the last question mark (back to Infinity typeface), and removed the orphan from the quote on page one. I see this as the final version.
-
-
Show Me Final cover
-
-
Show Me Final page 1
-
-
Show Me Final page 2
-
-
Show Me Final page 3
-
-
Show Me Final page 4
However, I am really glad I experimented with the other version, it is more fun and vibrant and in a style that is definitely out of my comfort zone. With each version I felt I was getting braver and I think this was important in terms of recognising some possible self-limiting assumptions I carry. It is hard to shrug off the notion of what ‘proper’ design looks like and be less constrained and more playful. I think I am starting to get better at experimenting and taking a risk on an approach that might not work out.
Save
Save
Save
Save
Save
Save
Save