Protest | Graphically Speaking

he word type wih the letters cut out so they are hinged

When I was researching protest typography for my Pinterest board I was really intrigued by the idea of typography and power. Having read an article by Co.Design and its focus on power and the role of DIY typography I found the work of Emily Schofield’s and her Situationist Typography.

“Typography is a tool of communication and it has to abide by these rules to be efficient,” explains the graphic designer, “so on what level can a letterform express protest? Can it break out of its supposed structures?” Initially, the designer experimented with many forms in print, playfully obscuring and dissolving letter but her move to digital type brought a broader application: “Can it be a typeface that actually acts, that doesn’t work? That’s what the digital can do, you can create action in a typeface.” Projects of protest

Schofield created an online programme that took a word you typed in and then morphed and disrupted it. This got me thinking about type behaving badly and how I might develop an alternative design. Rather than work digitally I started by cutting up the word ‘type’ and arranging it differently.

: Type cut ups 1

: Type cut ups 2

I then thought about cutting out the letters but in some ways that would simply produce a similar effect to reversed out text online. So rather than cutting the letters out completely I decided to try them being hinged. That got me thinking about what might sit behind. Initially, I was going to use a flat colour or possibly some texture. Then I thought I might put the word ‘type’ repeating behind. Thinking about the origins of typography in the West I eventually decided to use a copy of some pages of the Gutenberg bible.

: Cutout version 1

: Cutout version 2

: Cutout template

: Cutout version 3

I used a slab letter typeface (Myriad Pro) and decided to put the hinges in different places so the letters all sat at different angles. I made a prototype with just paper (version 1), I then repeated it with a heavier weight card (version 2). I then offset the letters, defying the rule of type being orderly and conforming to the rules.

I really liked the results but was a bit stuck on how I might use them as part of a design for the assignment. While they photograph reasonably well their sculptural nature doesn’t really translate to the 2 D page or monitor view. Maybe this is anti-type and no-one else gets to read it! Time to move on.

Protest Typography

Our civilization is based on the alphabet and numerals. These elementary marks have no semantic meaning, but have been assigned roles as visual substitutes for speech sounds and arithmetic quantities. (Meggs, 1992)

…typography with its ability to corporealize language can be a capable tool of intervention against issues that concern us as citizen-designers. In order to understand typography’s capacity as a means for design activism there is the need to perceive typography as part of a greater system, –a network that includes written communication, language, technology, politics and society. (Özkal, 2016)

Typography, it seems to me, has a crucial role to play in capturing our thoughts and putting them out in the world. Often this is probably done without much thought – we just happen to use whatever is set as the default on our computer or device. I remember for a long time in the organisations I worked for everything was Times New Roman for day-to-day communication.

Having worked with a designer when setting up my consultancy business I am aware that the relationship between the typeface used and the message you want to convey is very nuanced. We worked through a series of questions around the tone I wanted to set, as well as practicalities like legibility and readability. The typeface was saying something important about me and the character of my business.

I would argue that typography has an innate power. I have been collecting examples of protest typography on Pinterest and it is interesting to see that in most images of marches in particular, the placards are ubiquitous. The protest typography I have looked at so far seems to have a number of common characteristics:

It is designed to ‘shout’, to be big and bold
It is generally black, although reversed out typeface, and sometimes red are also used
Whether handwritten or printed it is predominantly all caps
It is also generally san serif, with quite a slab typeface
The message is usually conveyed as succinctly as possible – of the 117 images I have pinned so far the word count is generally between three and seven
Some are ‘designed’ and mass produced, others are handwritten on found materials

Its role seems to be to reinforce an uncompromising point. A statement that makes it clear what the bearer thinks about the issue in hand and that this view often sits in opposition to what might be regarded as a dominant ideology. I think this is what Oskal (2016) is referring to when he talks about being watchful of the invisible actors in typographic communication. This leaves me with a question about whether typography in itself is benign, is it purely the application that positions it?

Letters in their attempt to confront letters, create a crack that makes us become more watchful; hence recognize the invisible actors in typographic communication. Typography can work with or resist these actors, but in whichever way, to use its capacity it is necessary to perceive typography in its relation with other systems, such as language, technology, ideology and politics. (Özkal, 2016: 8)

References

Meggs, P. B. (1992). Type and image: The language of graphic design: John Wiley & Sons.

Özkal, Ö. (2016). Letters against letters: Typography as a means for Design Activism. Paper presented at the 5T Design & Resistence Conference Proceedings.

Save